The Hon. Daniel Hannan spoke to Genevieve Wood of the Heritage Foundation, about the enduring legacy of the Magna Carta, sealed in Runnymede 800 years ago. Watch it below.
Prominent ecologist and biologist Paul R. Ehrlich will be on tonight’s Q&A.
Dr Ehrlich was one of the world’s first global alarmists, with his 1968 book The Population Bomb warning of the death of hundreds of millions of people in the 1970s and 1980s due to global starvation because “the world is running out of food”.
The book, which was commissioned by the Sierra Club, called for “population control” through “changes in our value system but by compulsion if voluntary methods fail.”
As tends to be the case, Dr Ehrlich also promoted global cooling in the 1970s.
It will be interesting to see if any of his failed predictions are mentioned!
This exchange between ICAC officials and Sophia Tilley – the girlfriend of Margaret Cuneen’s son – is further evidence of the nature of this out of control organisation:
“There were these guys in suits. They were really solemn and they knew our names. They said, ‘We’re going to need to take your phones’,” Ms Tilley told The Australian in her first interview.
“We said, ‘We need our phones for work, who are you, why would we give you our phones?’
“They said, ‘We’re ICAC.’
“I said, ‘You’re not the police, I don’t know what ICAC is or who you are, we’re not going to give you our phones, why would we?’
“They said, ‘We’re above the police.’ They said ‘if you don’t you’ll face five years in prison’. They said, ‘Trust me, this is in your best interest to do what we say, we’re the guys who got Eddie Obeid.’ That’s how they tried to identify themselves.
“I don’t watch the news so I didn’t know who Eddie Obeid was.”
Initially thinking the ordeal was a practical joke, Ms Tilley asked the officers if the visit was to do with a friend who lived nearby.
“But they said, ‘No, it’s you’,” she said.
“We said, ‘Why? What have we done?’ and they said, ‘You’ll find out soon enough.'”
It’s worth reading the full exchange at The Australian here ($).
Miranda Devine lashes the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption in her column today for the Daily Telegraph:
I hope the Baird government is making plans for regime change at ICAC. Better yet, close down the discredited star chamber and save the taxpayer $28 million a year.
The benefit of any corruption deterrence has been outstripped by ICAC’s abuse of its extraordinary powers, particularly when it comes to the malicious pursuit of NSW prosecutor Margaret Cunneen, SC.
There is no escaping David Levine’s lacerating assessment of the organisation led by commissioner Megan Latham, whom he has described previously as a “sore loser”.
In his annual report, released on Friday, Levine says ICAC displays “almost breathtaking arrogance in relation to its own powers, in relation to the people with whom it is dealing, in relation to other institutions of governance of the state, not least the parliament to which the ICAC itself is accountable”.
The former Supreme Court judge, whose role as inspector is to oversee ICAC, describes his relationship with the organisation as characterised by “hauteur”. He also refers to the “dysfunctionality and contradictions that exist in the environment of corruption and investigation in this state”.
And that’s just the appetiser.
Read on here ($).
Parliamentary support for free speech continues to grow.
In a opinion article for the Federal Young Liberal Policy Journal, Liberal senator Eric Abetz has said that laws which prohibits insults and offensive speech is “anathema to the kind of free and open society that we should be promoting.”
As reported in The Australian today, Senator Abetz also encouraged his party to throw their support behind the Senator Bob Day’s amendment, which seeks to remove the words “offend” and “insult” from section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975. From The Australian:
“It will be a sad day if Liberals have to cross the floor to protect one of the great human freedoms — free speech.”
… Senator Abetz said while he was constrained as a minister in the Abbott government to support the party’s position, his “new-found freedom” as a backbencher allowed him to express support for Senator Day’s bill.
He also took aim at Malcolm Turnbull for maintaining Mr Abbott’s position on section 18C, despite previously expressing support for the change.
“With the new-found freedom I have been generously given, I don’t mind saying that I agreed with the then communications minister’s assessment that Senator Day’s bill was broadly supported and it wouldn’t have any negative impact.
“It is disappointing that the now Prime Minister appears to have changed his view,” he says. “It is still my hope, though, that the partyroom decides to support this bill as a whole.”
Senator Abetz joins the growing list of current senators who are on the record in support of amendments to section 18C. The now 14 senators in support of change are as follows:
- Eric Abetz (Liberal, Tas)
- Chris Back (Liberal, WA)
- Cory Bernardi (Liberal, SA)
- Joe Bullock (ALP, WA)
- Matt Canavan (Nationals, Qld)
- Bob Day (Family First, SA)
- Sean Edwards (Liberal, SA)
- David Leyonhjelm (Liberal Democrat, NSW)
- Ian Macdonald (Liberal, Qld)
- James McGrath (Liberal, Qld)
- Linda Reynolds (Liberal, WA)
- Scott Ryan (Liberal, Vic)
- Zed Seselja (Liberal, ACT)
- Dean Smith (Liberal, WA)
UPDATE: Link to the Federal Young Liberal Policy Journal, featuring Senator Abetz’ article, can be found here.
1. In excellent essay in the Wall Street Journal on Saturday, Matt Ridley described how technological evolution has momentum of its own – momentum which the government cannot dictate
2. In the Washington Post on Wednesday, George Will described the financial interests of US states underpinning ‘Prohibition 2.0‘ on sports betting
3. And in The Australian today, the fantastic Dr Jennifer Oriel – citing IPA research – highlights the problem of university courses leading new teachers to be hostile to the West ($).
This is the bizarre footage of a Sydney maniac exploding at a lady for committing the unspeakable crime of smoking outside.
No, the madman wasn’t reprimanded. As he says, what the lady was doing, while harming nobody else, was against the law. On the flimsiest of justifications, an increasing amount of outdoor smoke-free zones – including in Martin Place – have come into being. Anti-smoking hysteria is now the law.
And this war against smokers continues. The Herald Sun reports today that the City of Melbourne is set to create the city’s largest smoke-free zone:
Princes Park in Carlton and the Tan Track, spanning 3.8km around King’s Domain and the Botanic Gardens, have been highlighted for bans that could start as soon as April, according to confidential papers seen by the Herald Sun.
Make no mistake – this is the next step on the path to a smoke-free city, as Councillor Richard Foster makes explicitly clear several times in the report.
Practical difficulties in enforcement aside, this campaign is obviously paternalism writ large. Claiming to save people from themselves, or punishing people for undermining the public goal of ‘denormalising’ smoking is a poor excuse for government action.
However, the risk of civil discord should also be acknowledged. The more that the demonisation of smokers is internalised in our laws, madmen will be ever more emboldened to harass others, as in the above video. How long before words become actions, and shouting becomes violence?
Darcy Allen is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs and Jason Potts is an Adjunct Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs.
Imposing mandatory prescriptions for drugs containing codeine will line the pockets of medical professionals at the cost of taxpayers.
Recently the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre at the University of NSW released research showing codeine-related deaths increased from 3.5 to 8.7 per million of the population from 2000 to 2009.
That sounds very bad, but almost all of these approximately 150 deaths per year involved ‘multiple drug toxicity’. That is, codeine was one of several drugs involved. So it’s not actually even obvious that codeine is the problem here.
Nevertheless, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) maintains codeine is an addictive ‘drug of abuse’ in desperate need of regulatory attention. Their recent interim decision means all over-the-counter medicines containing codeine be changed to prescription-only as early as mid-2016.
One of the quickest ways to effectively assess calls for new regulations is to follow the money. So, who wins and who loses from making codeine prescription-only?
Doctors win. Forcing more patients to queue at the door for basic prescriptions means more money in the pockets of GPs. A Macquarie University study finds up-scheduling analgesics will directly cost consumers an additional $70 million, and cost the PBS an additional $170 million. That money flows to doctors.
Consumers and pharmacies lose. If such a proposal goes ahead this means hundreds of popular painkillers — including Panadeine Forte, Nurofen Plus and Codral Cold and Flu — will become more expensive and inconvenient for everyday Australians. Pain will become a lot more painful.
While it has been amusing to see the some of the reaction to Malcolm Turnbull’s recent comments about coal and nuclear, including one think tank describing the former Rhodes Scholar and investment banker as not understanding markets, we should all welcome a broadening of the Australian energy debate.
In reality, the prime minister is merely stating the obvious on both issues – that:
- Australian coal exports can help hundreds of millions of people worldwide who have no or limited access to electricity; and
- the development of an Australian nuclear industry is worthy of consideration.
Australia, and particularly South Australia, needs industries that can stand on their own two feet and are internationally competitive. According to today’s AFR, a nuclear industry could potentially be worth $35 billion per year, while coal of course earns us at least $40 billion per year in export income, provides over 40,000 jobs, and is responsible for most of the east coast’s electricity.
South Australia alone is said to have 25 per cent of the world’s uranium, and already has Australia’s most expensive electricity. After its last coal-fired power station closes in March 2016, it will gradually start experiencing power supply problems, especially during peak demand periods. Wind is no good for reliable base load power, as the below screen-shot from NEM Watch, taken in the middle of today, shows. So much for South Australia’s much vaunted 1,473 megawatts of wind capacity!
The role of government should be to ensure a level playing field for the various energy sources and technologies to compete, rather than trying to pick energy winners. If Australia can power itself with coal and with uranium, and also help India to reach its extraordinary potential by exporting both, then government should not be get in the way.
ICAC gets a taste of its own medicine. Chriss Merrit and Sharri Markson in The Australian:
The corruption watchdog’s playbook often involves playing a secret recording or sensational telephone intercept revealing the witness they are interrogating misled the court just moments earlier… The person of interest has been caught out. Red-faced. And has nowhere to hide.
This time, ICAC is the one caught out:
A film recording shows its investigators making a video record of a document outside the scope of their search warrant.
ICAC have now admitted they did not have the power to seize the document.
Yet, the video obtained by The Australian shows ICAC officers filming it page by page.
… Senior investigator Paul Grainger appeared to ignore a warning from [David Curd, the man behind the camera] that a document they were about to film did not “relate” to their raid in the Obeid offices.
Mr Grainger is the same officer named in a complaint to the ICAC Inspector, former judge David Levine, for allegedly videotaping a re-enactment of a seizure of Margaret Cunneen’s mobile phone when it had already been in ICAC’s possession for a week.
Watch the video on The Australian site here.